THE MINISTRY OF UNGENTLEMANLY WARFARE (2024)

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and a group of military officials hatch a daring plan to neutralize Hitler's fleet of German U-boats during World War II. Made up of a motley crew of rogues and mavericks, the top-secret combat unit uses unconventional techniques to battle the Nazis and change the course of the war.

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, directed by Guy Ritchie and featuring a screenplay by Paul Tamasy, Eric Johnson, and Arash Amel, aims to provide a blend of action, intrigue, and historical drama. Starring Henry Cavill, Alan Ritchson, and Alex Pettyfer, the film promises an exciting journey into a lesser-known aspect of World War II. However, despite the intriguing premise and a talented cast, the movie falls short of its potential, leaving audiences underwhelmed and disappointed.


At its core, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare is based loosely on declassified documents from the archives of Winston Churchill, former British Prime Minister. The narrative explores the formation of a covert unit designed to engage in unconventional warfare against the Nazis, with a focus on a group of rugged, skilled operatives. This team, known for their "ungentlemanly" tactics, is tasked with missions that traditional soldiers could not undertake, blending elements of espionage, sabotage, and direct combat.

The film’s strongest suit lies in its action sequences and visual storytelling. Ritchie, known for his stylish direction, delivers a series of engaging and bloody set pieces that highlight the brutal realities of war. The choreography and special effects work seamlessly to create a visceral experience, particularly during a rescue mission that pits the team against a much larger Nazi force. Despite the impressive action, these scenes are undermined by a lack of genuine tension. The film struggles to convey any real sense of danger or stakes, making even the most intense moments feel oddly safe and predictable.


One of the standout performances comes from Eiza González, who portrays Marjorie Stewart, an alluring and formidable operative. Her character brings a spark to the otherwise dull ensemble, displaying a blend of intelligence and fiery conviction. As the only female member of the team, Marjorie faces unique challenges, but González manages to make her stand out amidst a sea of male counterparts. However, her storyline, which includes a subplot involving the seduction of a senior German officer played by Til Schweiger, feels tangential and underdeveloped. The film does not give her enough moments to shine beyond the typical femme fatale archetype.

The male leads, including Cavill and Ritchson, deliver solid performances but are hampered by a script that offers little in terms of character development. The characters lack depth and individuality, often speaking in the same tone and failing to establish a strong camaraderie. This lack of differentiation makes it difficult for the audience to connect with them or care about their fates. The portrayal of Ian Fleming (Freddie Fox), the famous author and government advisor, adds a layer of historical intrigue but does little to elevate the film beyond a surface-level exploration of wartime tactics.


Ritchie’s film also suffers from a confused tone. It oscillates between trying to be a serious war drama, a comedic adventure, and a high-octane action movie. This tonal inconsistency prevents the film from building momentum or fully engaging the audience. The initial promise of a thrilling adventure with a group of swashbuckling operatives quickly fizzles out as the narrative becomes bogged down in predictable plot developments and lacklustre dialogue. Even the attempts at humour, which could have provided a much-needed levity, fall flat, failing to elicit more than a mild chuckle.

The plot, though inspired by true events, is rendered with a lack of urgency. The supposed high stakes, such as the potential to turn the tide of the war, are not effectively conveyed. The mission’s objectives, such as destroying Nazi U-boats, come across as a mere backdrop to a series of loosely connected action scenes. The film’s climax, while slightly more engaging than the preceding acts, still lacks the necessary tension and excitement to leave a lasting impact.


Ultimately, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare struggles to live up to the expectations set by its premise and talent. The characters are two-dimensional, the story lacks compelling development, and the action, though well-executed, cannot compensate for the absence of genuine stakes. The film is reminiscent of other wartime dramas like Inglourious Basterds, but without the same sharpness or wit. It is a shame, as the material had the potential to be an engaging exploration of unconventional wartime tactics and the personalities behind them.

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare is an unsatisfying film that fails to deliver on its promise. While it offers a few moments of entertainment, particularly in its action sequences, it is ultimately let down by a lacklustre script and underdeveloped characters. Fans of Guy Ritchie may find some enjoyment in his trademark style, but overall, the film does not reach the heights of his previous works. For those seeking a compelling war film with depth and excitement, this one may be best left on the shelf.

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare was released on Prime Video on April 19, 2024